equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
61 This test is aimed at validating the COST231 model. The test is similar to the Okumura Hata one, except that the frequency used is the EUTRA band #1 (2140 MHz) and that the test can be performed only for large and small cities in urban scenarios due to model limitations. |
61 This test is aimed at validating the COST231 model. The test is similar to the Okumura Hata one, except that the frequency used is the EUTRA band #1 (2140 MHz) and that the test can be performed only for large and small cities in urban scenarios due to model limitations. |
62 |
62 |
63 Test #3 2.6 GHz model |
63 Test #3 2.6 GHz model |
64 --------------------- |
64 --------------------- |
65 |
65 |
66 This test validates the 2.6 empirical model [pl26ghz]_. The test is similar to Okumura Hata one except that the frequency is the EUTRA band #7 (2620 MHz) and the test can be performed only in urban scenario. |
66 This test validates the 2.6 GHz Kun model. The test is similar to Okumura Hata one except that the frequency is the EUTRA band #7 (2620 MHz) and the test can be performed only in urban scenario. |
67 |
67 |
68 Test #4 ITU1411 LoS model |
68 Test #4 ITU1411 LoS model |
69 ------------------------- |
69 ------------------------- |
70 |
70 |
71 This test is aimed at validating the ITU1411 model in case of line of sight within street canyons transmissions. In this case the UE is placed at 100 meters far from the eNB, since the threshold for switching between LoS and NLoS is left to default one (i.e., 200 m.). |
71 This test is aimed at validating the ITU1411 model in case of line of sight within street canyons transmissions. In this case the UE is placed at 100 meters far from the eNB, since the threshold for switching between LoS and NLoS is left to default one (i.e., 200 m.). |